Olivier Berthod

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 01/01/2024
• Auteurs : Héloïse BerkowitzOlivier BerthodMichael Grothe-Hammer
• Organismes : Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail Aix Marseille Université Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School NTNU Samfunnsforskning AS / NTNU Social Research
• Publié dans Revue Française de Gestion le 28/10/2020

---

Résumé : Une école européenne des organisations émerge, fondée sur la décision et rapprochant la théorie des systèmes sociologique de Luhmann, les concepts d’organisation partielle et de méta-organisation de Ahrne et Brunsson, et d’organisationnalité de Dobusch et Schoeneborn. Dans notre revue narrative de la littérature, nous identifions trois dimensions clés supplémentaires apportés par la recherche francophone : la temporalité, la territorialité et la professionnalité des organisations. Nous proposons une approche intégratrice et des pistes de recherche.

---

Fichiers liés : ODT RFG working paper Berkowitz et al.pdf

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Chapître d'ouvrage
• Date de publi. : 27/07/2023
• Auteurs : António Cunha Meneses AbrantesOlivier Berthod
• Organismes : Toulouse Business School Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School

---

Résumé : Organizational improvisation is often enacted as a response to an unexpected disruption or sudden change, comprising an integral element of sensemaking. When the improvisational trigger occurs, several processes are set off which may also comprise several periods of the improvisational process. In this chapter. we identify three periods that fall within the framework of influence of the improvisational process which, as a whole, we termed the improvisational arc. Each of these periods corresponds to a different phase of improvisational sensemaking. Right after the trigger, organizational agents have to ponder the potential improvisation and decide on its implementation. This improvisation decision period corresponds to the improvisational decision sensemaking phase. Once the decision is made, the improvisation period begins, which corresponds to the improvisational action sensemaking phase. When improvisation ends, a period of improvisation aftermath is initiated, which corresponds to the improvisational retrospective sensemaking phase. Based on Weick's theory of sensemaking (1995), this chapter addresses the different characteristics associated with the different phases of the improvisational sensemaking process along the improvisational arc. The chapter contributes to the improvisation and sensemaking literatures. By taking the perspective of the seven characteristics of sensemaking proposed by Weick, it allows for an in-depth look at the different periods of the improvisational arc in order to better understand how the meaning of emergent reality is constructed, and how this construction takes various forms throughout the different phases of improvisational sensemaking.

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Communication dans un congrès
• Date de publi. : 06/07/2023
• Auteurs : Olivier Berthod
• Organismes : Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 22/02/2023
• Auteurs : Olivier BerthodThomas BlanchetHenner BuschConrad KunzeColin NoldenMichelle Wenderlich
• Organismes : Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School Technical University of Berlin / Technische Universität Berlin Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies Freie Universität Berlin University of Oxford University of Bristol [Bristol] Clark University
• Publié dans Environmental Management le 30/10/2020

---

Résumé : A wide range of actors are seeking to democratize energy systems. In the collaborative governance process of energy system transitions to net zero, however, many energy democracy concepts are watered down or abandoned entirely. Using five renewable energy case studies, we first explore the diversity of energy democratizing system challengers and bottom-up actors. Secondly, we analyze the role of conflict and challenges arising from the subsequent collaborative governance process and identify what appear to be blind spots in the CG literature. Our case studies on Berlin (GER), Jena (GER), Kalmar (SWE), Minneapolis (US) and Southeast England (UK) include different types of policy processes and actors. They suggest that actors championing energy democracy principles play an important role in opening participation in the early stages of collaborative energy transition governance. As collaborative governance progresses, participation tends to be increasingly restricted. We conclude that collaborative processes by themselves are insufficient in maintaining energy democracy principles in the energy transition. These require institutional embedding of participative facilitation and consensus building. The Kalmar case study as our only successful example of energy democracy suggests that a more intermediated and service-oriented approach to energy provision can create a business case for democratizing energy provision through collaborative governance.

---

Fichiers liés : s00267-022-01687-8.pdf

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Rapport
• Date de publi. : 01/01/2023
• Auteurs : Maja ApeltOlivier BerthodConstanze Breuer
• Organismes : University of Potsdam = Universität Potsdam Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School

---

Résumé : Feuer, Wasser, Erdbeben, Umweltkatastrophen, bewaffnete Konflikte und andere Ereignisse können Kulturgüter in wenigen Augenblicken zerstören oder so schwer beschädigen, dass sie auf lange Zeit nicht mehr genutzt werden können oder sogar gänzlich verloren sind. Ein Notfall oder gar eine Katastrophe sollte niemals auf unvorbereitete Akteure treffen. Die Besonderheit im Fall von Kulturgütern ist, dass es nicht nur darum geht, das Schadensereignis selbst zu bekämpfen, sondern auch darum, die Kulturgüter möglichst unversehrt zu bergen. Dafür müssen die Kulturgut bewahrenden Einrichtungen mit anderen Organisationen wie z. B. der Feuerwehr eng zusammenarbeiten. Dieses Diskussionspapier legt das Wissen aus der Organisations- und Katastrophenforschung zur zuverlässigen Bewältigung von Notfallsituationen dar und beschreibt davon ausgehend die organisatorischen Voraussetzungen, die für eine effektive Notfallvorsorge für Kulturgüter hierzulande unabdingbar sind.

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 07/11/2022
• Auteurs : Michael Grothe-HammerHéloïse BerkowitzOlivier Berthod
• Organismes : Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Aalesund] Aix Marseille Université Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail ICN Business School
• Publié dans Teoria e Cultura le 09/11/2022

---

Résumé : Neste texto são desenvolvidas as bases para uma Teoria Decisória nas Organizações (TDO). Abordagens importantes, como a teoria dos sistemas sociológicos, a da organização parcial e meta-organizacional, ou a organizacionalidade, compartilham a suposição de que as decisões são um componente central das organizações. Entretanto, os estudos de organização ainda falham em explicar plenamente o papel das decisões no surgimento e na continuação da organização. No entanto, enquanto as sociedades pré-modernas poderiam contar com ordens institucionalizadas na forma de tradições e autoridades, o mundo contemporâneo repousa sobre uma miríade de decisões para lidar com as complexidades sociais. Assim, desenvolvemos, de forma integrada, uma Teoria Decisória nas Organizações (TDO) na qual articulamos vários conceitos da teoria da organização, apresentando a organização tanto como um sistema de decisões quanto como uma ordem social decidida. Assumindo, adiante, a organização como um continua, distinguimos entre ‘organizacionalidade entitativa’, ou seja, os graus de organizacionalidade no nível da entidade, e ‘organizacionalidade estrutural’, ou seja, uma combinação de elementos organizacionais. Esta abordagem constitui um desenvolvimento importante para a Teoria Organizacional (TO) porque nos ajuda a analisar a complexa estratificação e o entrelaçamento das ordens sociais dentro, fora, entre e como organização(ões), e a identificar pesquisas futuras sobre o ‘aninhamento’ da organização e a manutenção dos limites organizacionais

---

Fichiers liés : Teoria Decisória nas Organizações_MIchael Grothe Hammer et al_[vf.tdp.pdf

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 26/01/2022
• Auteurs : Thomas BlanchetOlivier BerthodCarsten Herzberg
• Organismes : Nexus Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises ICN Business School University of Potsdam = Universität Potsdam
• Publié dans Public Management Review le 26/10/2020

---

Résumé : The co-production of public services by users and professionals has been the subject of much discussion. By contrast, we know little about how users engage in the regulation of co-produced services, a process we call co-regulation. Relying on the concept of civil regulation, our qualitative case study analysis of the Grenoble water services reveals three activities at play in co-regulation: information processing, standard-setting and modifying behaviours. Moreover, we highlight boundary conditions for co-regulation to be effective and contribute to value co-creation, namely an active civil society and strong relationships with local decision-makers.

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 01/09/2021
• Auteurs : Olivier BerthodMarkus HelfenCarsten Wirth
• Organismes : ICN Business School Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck - University of Innsbruck University of Applied Sciences [Darmstadt]
• Publié dans Scandinavian Journal of Management le 29/10/2020

---

Résumé : In this paper, we coin the term “organizational expulsion” to theorize a process of purposeful inequality creation by management through excluding groups of employees from the organization. Empirical observations at four case studies of restructuring in German airports show how management expelled an entire workforce segment through social practices of boundary work. This boundary work includes three sets of practices: (1) restricting options for internal representation, (2) justifying a re-evaluation of organizational members’ contributions, and (3) negotiating the consequences for remaining members. We discuss how organizational explanations of inequality production could benefit from embracing organizational expulsion as a more actor-oriented, political as well as context-sensitive concept. Further studies into organizational expulsion could look into other varieties of organizations and industry settings to deepen our understanding of when, how and with what consequences dominant groups in organizations shift the burden of organizational adaptation to vulnerable groups within organizations and beyond.

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Article dans une revue
• Date de publi. : 01/03/2021
• Auteurs : Olivier BerthodMichael Grothe‐hammerRyan HagenJörg Sydow
• Organismes : Jacobs University = Constructor University [Bremen]
• Publié dans Public Administration le 02/11/2020

---

Source

---

• Type de publi. : Chapître d'ouvrage
• Date de publi. : 01/01/2021
• Auteurs : Olivier BerthodJörg Sydow
• Organismes : Jacobs University = Constructor University [Bremen]

---

Source